Archive for the ‘Web’ Category

Thoughts on Twitterville

Sunday, October 10th, 2010

Good little book here. While there is much to learn, this is not a How-To book. Now I’ve only started using Twitter with abandon over the last month or so. Sure, I opened an account a few years ago, but was too busy working on my dissertation and then getting settled in at Mizzou to spend any time playing with it. At that point I saw no need to use it. After all, I was busy condensing my life. I closed my Yahoo account after they decimated Yahoo! 360°. I ended my relationship with MySpace – and really, who hasn’t. I figured Facebook and LinkedIn would be enough for me. I was wrong.

There’s something about Twitter that has captured my imagination. I cannot pinpoint it, but I like the ‘real-timeyness’ of it, as compared to FaceBook and LinkedIn. While all are communites of a sort, there’s a difference. LinkedIn I use for my professional persona, looking for places that might need my skills talents and abilities. It is business first. FaceBook no longer seems to be the small community it once was. It is akin to a megalopolis or megaregion: there’s a hugeness to it now.

Perhaps that is why Shel Israel’s “Twitterville” as a name fits so well. It takes a village to raise a child and there are village idiots running around out looking for other village idiots. Twitter fits between the seriousness of the one endeavor and silliness of the second.

Twitterville covers the history of Twitter. Yes. Ho-hum. More than that, it is a compilation loaded with stories, exemplars and parables. If narratives and stories are one of the most important ways we make sense of our world, than Israel does a great job of ‘making sense’ of Twitter, removing some of the ambiguity and equivocality. Karl E. Weick is just as applicable online as off.

He delves wonderfully into Twitter culture. That’s not an easy thing when looking at a village as broad and loosely connected as Twitter is. He shows clients or customers contacting businesses with complaints and bravos and how those businesses reacted. (Most of the time: FAST!) He shows through stories and anecdotes how marketing and PR professionals have to become more conversational then uni-directional. The point is interaction and conversation. The hypodermic needle model (which has been pretty well been debunked anyway) of mediated communication does not work when Tweeting.

He gives due warning about trolls and spammers and scammers and other undesirable PITAs you may come across and what to do about them.

There are tips for both organizational and personal branding scattered throughout the book. So, if you are someone longing to make yourself into a brand, there’s a lot here to discover and become motivated. And it’s a heck of a good read too. That alone makes it a pleasure and makes it stand out amongst boring business books.

You could become the next Miss Destructo!

Twitter: Collective Intelligence

Monday, January 5th, 2009

Science Fiction fans will be familiar with the idea of The Borg: a race of beings from the Star Trek franchise. These cyborg entities communicated to each other (the collective) using their built-in, high tech devices. Not unlike a hive of bees, The Borg were able to learn and adapt from the shared experiences of one another … a sort of collective intelligence.

Collective intelligence is a shared or group intelligence that emerges from the collaboration and competition of many individuals. Collective intelligence appears in a wide variety of forms of consensus decision making in bacteria, animals, humans, and computer networks. The study of collective intelligence may properly be considered a subfield of sociology, of business, of computer science, of mass communications and of mass behavior—a field that studies collective behavior from the level of quarks to the level of bacterial, plant, animal, and human societies.

We’ve seen forms of collective intelligence in such web media outlets as forums, blogs, etc. With Twitter, there is an immediacy and personalization that raises this phenomenon to a more powerful level because:

  • Hand held devices with cellular service allow for communication to take place on the go. Tweets are much easier to provide by cell phone users than attempting to interface with a website. The advent of better smart phones have alleviated this problem to a degree. However, only a small segment of consumers have the new breed of smart phone. Those that do may be more likely to use Twitter to post information owing to its ease of use.
  • While blogs and forums provide for group contribution, the communication occurs at a 3rd party repository that houses the information. Not so for Twitter. Twitter is about individuals communicating with individuals. When a message is broadcast, that message gets sent to 1400 people; not 1 website.

Companies are looking to leverage Twitter as a way to augment their business practices. Everyone from Dell, Comcast, Zappos and hundreds more are finding ways to utilize Twitter as a means to provide better customer support, build brand loyalty and so forth. But, I appreciate the more mundane uses that benefit people, not products.

The Wall Street Journal reports about one Mr. Rothamel who “once used the service to help identity some flowers growing in his front yard”. Others will never spend more than $40 on a purchase without first sending a tweet asking for advice. Stories such as these are widespread and common about the benefits of Twitter to the individual from the whole. It is this collective intelligence that makes it all possible.

Gravatars, Wavatars, Identicons and the MonsterID

Monday, November 17th, 2008

In the beginning there was avatar. And the avatar was good. But in time it became hard to replicate over and over again across many different blogs and forums and MySpace and Facebook and LinkedIn and lord knows where else you people have been!

Like obedient servants, we did as asked; replicating avatars everywhere we went in a tedious process. Perhaps we picked a new one each time in some random fashion. We scoured the Internet for the latest inane GIFs linking to them and hoping the links stayed valid or pilfering them and uploading the files to Imageshack and the like.

Then, one fine day, the web gods smiled upon us and, taking forth the Book of Armaments, Chapter Two, verses Nine to Twenty-one, were inspired to produce the Gravatar (Globally Recognized Avatar). The Gravatar, unlike its red-neck cousin avatar, is not simply a hyperlinked image from anywhere. Rather, it is a service which uses your encrypted email address to correlate you to a specific image uploaded by you and hosted by Gravatar itself. Yes, it’s free. Any software that supports Gravatar can interface with it so that you never need specify an avatar again so long as you use that email address, buddy.

We’re not out of the Fire Swamp yet, Buttercup. You see, Gravatar images may not necessarily be unique. That is to say, there does not appear to be anything preventing the same image being used for 2 different accounts. The horror! If this is what you’re after, consider them groovy Wavatars, Identicons and the MonsterIDs. Say what?

Wavatars
Identicons
MonsterIDs

Based on your encrypted email address, these automatically generated ‘avatars’ can be considered unique. Each different service claims differing combinations in the billions. Wavatar, for example, notes that in excess of 55 billion different Wavatar icons are possible. The tradeoff? You have no control over what they look like. As Mom would say, “You get what you get and you don’t throw a fit.”

Here at the Untangled Web, we use Gravatars with Identicons as the fallback service. This means that if you have no Gravatar defined, an Identicon will be provided for you. Isn’t that sweet of us? Sign up for a Gravatar now or let us produce an Identicon for you. Then go ahead and comment. Give it a try…


All works licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. And that's a mouthful!